Impact of Jute Reinforcement on the Resilience at the Outermost Limits of Cohesive Black-top Geomaterials

Ali Saad; Maaz Allah

doi:10.54060/a2zjournals.jmce.51

Authors

Ali Saad Department of Civil Engineering Integral University Lucknow, 226026, Uttar Pradesh, India
Dr. Maaz Allah Department of Civil Engineering, University Institute of Engineering and Technology (UIET), Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, 226025, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54060/a2zjournals.jmce.51

Keywords:

Jute fiber, California bearing ratio, Cohesion-less soil, geo-material

Abstract

In this work, cohesion-less asphalt geo-material supported with multi-facets of geo-support as jute filaments have been contemplated. The current work is complet-ed on the unreinforced soil and jute fiber supported soil to research the strength and firmness limit of asphalt geo-materials utilizing California bearing ratio (CBR) test. The quantity of layers, ideal profundity and arrangement of the geo-support in geo-material are researched. The implant profundity of jute fiber, i.e., D/2, D/3 and D/4 in single, twofold, and significantly increase layers has been upgraded utilizing CBR values. A clever idea of firmness limit alongside entrance factor is acquainted with assess the strength of the unreinforced and jute-supported geo-material. The experimental outcomes exhibit that remembering jute fiber for single, twofold and triple layer builds the solidness limit of the dirt at the ideal profundity of D/4. The liquid limit at shifted input boundary fluctuates from 0.378 to 0.682 at most extreme entrance factor which shown an 80.42 % upgrade of solidarity in asphalt geo-material. The result of the current review gives a savvy answer for the strength improvement in cohesion-less soils for dike, subgrade, and asphalt development ad-vances.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. Kazemi Darabadi, A. Khavandi Khiavi, and A. Ouria, “Evaluation of the compactness of subbase and base geo-materials by using stiffness,” Sādhanā, 2018.

J.-S. Lee, E. Tutumluer, and W.-T. Hong, “Stiffness evaluation of compacted geo-materials using crosshole-type dynamic cone penetrometer (CDP), rPLT, and LFWD,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 303, no. 124015, 2021.

P. S. K. Ooi and J. Pu, “Use of stiffness for evaluating compactness of cohesive pavement geomaterials,” Transp. Res. Rec., vol. 1849, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2003.

M. Singh, A. Trivedi, and S. K. Shukla, “Evaluation of geo-synthetic reinforcement in unpaved road using moving wheel load test,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 655–667, 2022.

M. Singh, A. Trivedi, and S. K. Shukla, “Influence of Geo-synthetic Reinforcement on Unpaved Roads Based on CBR, and Static and Dynamic Cone Penetration Tests,” International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, vol. 6, no. 2, 2020.

M. Singh, A. Trivedi, and S. K. Shukla, “Unpaved test sections reinforced with geotextile and geogrid,” Mater. Today, vol. 32, pp. 706–711, 2020.

I. Takewaki, “An approach to stiffness-damping simultaneous optimization,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 641–650, 2000.

H. S. Yu, S. M. Tan, and F. Schnaid, “A critical state framework for modelling bonded geo-materials,” An International Journal of Geomechanics and Geoengineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 61–74, 2007.